{"created":"2023-06-20T15:28:21.225776+00:00","id":7384,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"7c257dc7-77ac-4632-a3b4-1a509122f2bd"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"7384","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"7384"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:ouj.repo.nii.ac.jp:00007384","sets":["470:394:447"]},"author_link":["9201","9200"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1998-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"59","bibliographicPageStart":"35","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"15","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"放送大学研究年報"},{"bibliographic_title":"Journal of the University of the Air","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　死刑廃止論が盛んである．実務では，最高裁判所がいわゆる保険金詐取目的殺人等被告事件に関する平成8年9月20日の第二小法廷判決（白建土木3億円保険金殺人事件上告審判決）で共謀共同正犯として第一審及び控訴審で死刑判決を受けた被告人のうち一名につき死刑判決を破棄し無期懲役刑を言い渡して自判し（判時1581号33頁），東京高等裁判所は平成9年5月12日，強制猥褻等の非行により初等少年院送致を受け2年間収容され，その後，別罪の有罪判決の執行猶予中に強姦致傷の犯行に及び刑に服した前歴を持つ被告人が，その後犯した2件の強盗強姦，強盗強姦殺人で第一審裁判所において死刑を言い渡された事件においてこの死刑判決を破棄し無期懲役刑を言い渡している（判時1613号150頁）．\n　わが国の死刑制度は寛刑の傾向にある．しかし，この傾向は，単なる寛刑傾向と評するには無理がある．上記東京高裁の事例は凄惨を極める．\n　他方，死刑廃止論は世界の「潮流」を背景に盛んにその主張を展開している．しかし，その死刑廃止論は「死刑」それ自体の廃止論であり，わが国の死刑制度を前提としてはいない．だが，死刑存廃の問は主権行使と文化の問に直結する．\n　わが国の法状況を前提に，現在展開されている死刑廃止論を批判的に検討し，果たして，死刑はわが国において本当に廃止されなければならないのかどうか．この点を検討する．","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10019636","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0911-4505","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_textarea_25":{"attribute_name":"抄録（英）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_language":"en","subitem_textarea_value":"　Must the death penalty of Japan abolish? The abolitionists of Japan have made an appeal for abolishment of the capital punishment of Japan.\n　In practice, on September 20, 1996, the Second Petty Bench of the Supreme Court of Japan vacated the death sentence the Court of Appeals had sentenced the defendant to because of the conspiracy of felony murder, committed on purpose to obtain the illegal gain i.e. the fraud by kidnapping, and then punished the defendant with life sentence.\n　On May 12, 1997, the Tokyo Court of Appeals vacated the death sentence the Trial Court had sentenced the defendant to because of the first degree murder that was committed in the perpetration of rape and robbery, and also punished the defendant with life sentence.\n　The practical trend of sentencing of Japan has been becoming less harsh. Is that in justice?\n　And the international trends toward the abolishment of death penalty are just a factual cause not a legal one to abolish or maintain the death penalty of Japan.\n　I have heard that the problem of misjudgment is the most decisive one as to whether death penalty should be abolished. The problem of misjudgment is, however, not peculiar to death penalty at all. Any other punishment as well as capital punishment can not be compensated by any means. So the problem of misjudgmenet is not decisive.\n　We should take the victimus of serious crimes, i.e. the first degree murder seriously.\n　In this paper, the issue as to whether death penalty should be abolished will be analysed wkh scrutinizing the capital cases to appeal maintain the death penalty of Japan. Must the death penalty of Japan abolish?"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"橋本, 裕蔵"},{"creatorName":"ハシモト, ユウゾウ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"9200","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Hashimoto, Yuzo","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"9201","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2013-06-14"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"NO_15-35-59.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3.3 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"NO_15-35-59","url":"https://ouj.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/7384/files/NO_15-35-59.pdf"},"version_id":"57c2ad81-c81c-49a1-b957-4fb8b3eeb7bd"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"わが国の死刑制度を考える","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"わが国の死刑制度を考える"},{"subitem_title":"Must the death penalty of Japan abolish?","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"3","path":["447"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2013-06-14"},"publish_date":"2013-06-14","publish_status":"0","recid":"7384","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["わが国の死刑制度を考える"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-06-20T16:16:35.499857+00:00"}