{"created":"2023-06-20T15:28:43.451442+00:00","id":8220,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"35dfb130-9d40-44b5-8e01-451a5f86ff7d"},"_deposit":{"created_by":12,"id":"8220","owners":[12],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"8220"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:ouj.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008220","sets":["389:531"]},"author_link":["10522","10518","10521","10519","10523","10520"],"item_10001_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-12-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3","bibliographicPageEnd":"381","bibliographicPageStart":"373","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"31","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"日本教育工学会論文誌"},{"bibliographic_title":"Japan journal of educational technology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10001_description_12":{"attribute_name":"論文ID（NAID）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"110006794725","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10001_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"学習者間の相互評価で公平なフィードバックを行うために,評価者が実際につけた評価値を,個々の評価者の評価特性を考慮して補正する方法を提案する.相互評価では,通常,全ての学習者が他の全ての学習者と相互に評価し合うことは困難であり,非常に欠測値の多いデータを扱うことになる.提案する方法では,項目応答理論のメタファを用いた評価モデルにより各評価者の評価特性を推定し,平均的な評価特性の評価者による評価値との差を用いて,評価値の補正を行う.提案した方法を実データに適用して,補正を行うことにより妥当な評価値に近づくことを確認した.さらに,実際の授業において,5回にわたって相互評価を実施し,評価結果を評価者にフィードバックしたところ,補正値をフィードバックされた評価者は評価能力が向上したが,補正前の評価値のみをフィードバックされた評価者は評価能力が向上しなかった.これらの結果から,提案した補正方法は,公平な評価,学習者の評価能力の向上に有効であることが示された.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10001_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"We proposed the method of revising an evaluated score in considering of the evaluator's characteristic for an impartial feedback in a peer evaluation. Because it is difficult to evaluate all learners, peer evaluation data include many missing responses. In the proposal method, we assumed the evaluators' characteristic modeling based on the item response theory, and the evaluated score is revised by using the difference of estimated evaluator's characteristic and the evaluator of an average evaluation. In the proposal method, we assumed the evaluators' characteristic modeling based on the item response theory, and an evaluated score is revised by using the difference of estimated evaluator's characteristic and the evaluator of an average evaluation. It was confirmed that the revised score was appropriate evaluation by real data. We practiced peer evaluation five times in our class. As a result of practice, it was found that the evaluators received feedback with revised score improved the evaluation ability, but the evaluator received only evaluation value before revision did not improved. Because the above-mentioned result, it was shown that proposed revision method was effective to an impartial evaluation and the improvement of the evaluation ability.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10001_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"10521","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"FUJIHARA, Yasuhiro"}]},{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"10522","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"OHNISHI, Hitoshi"}]},{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"10523","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"KATO, Hiroshi"}]}]},"item_10001_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"日本教育工学会"}]},"item_10001_relation_18":{"attribute_name":"他の資源との関係","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"isVersionOf: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006794725"}]}]},"item_10001_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"日本教育工学会"},{"subitem_rights":"本文データは学協会の許諾に基づきCiNiiから複製したものである"}]},"item_10001_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11964147","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10001_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"13498290","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"藤原, 康宏"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"10518","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"大西, 仁"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"10519","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"加藤, 浩"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"10520","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2014-10-29"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"110006794725.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"多数の欠測値を含む相互評価データにおける評価者の評価特性補正方法","url":"https://ouj.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/8220/files/110006794725.pdf"},"version_id":"237d6219-09b2-45cc-9fc9-3ca15a000092"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"相互評価","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"教育評価","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"評価特性","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"教育データ","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"補正","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"PEER EVALUATION","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"EVALUATOR'S CHARACTERISTIC IN APEEREVALUATION","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"EDUCATIONALDATA","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"REVISION OF AN EVALUATION RESULT","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"journal article","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"多数の欠測値を含む相互評価データにおける評価者の評価特性補正方法(<特集>学習オブジェクト・学習データの活用と集約)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"多数の欠測値を含む相互評価データにおける評価者の評価特性補正方法(<特集>学習オブジェクト・学習データの活用と集約)"},{"subitem_title":"The Development of the Method to Revise an Evaluated Score in Considering of the Evaluator's Characteristic for a Peer Evaluation with Many Missing Responses(<Special Issue> Application and Aggregation of Learning Objects and Learning Data)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10001","owner":"12","path":["531"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2014-10-29"},"publish_date":"2014-10-29","publish_status":"0","recid":"8220","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["多数の欠測値を含む相互評価データにおける評価者の評価特性補正方法(<特集>学習オブジェクト・学習データの活用と集約)"],"weko_creator_id":"12","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-12-19T06:57:22.697832+00:00"}